The housing market continues to be unfriendly to most who are looking to sell their homes. Despite market conditions however, California offers a small solution to the problem in the form of a certification that helps certain homes stick out among the smog.

The certification is a green label given to homes by LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), GreenPoint Rated and Energy Star. These three labels offer green homes and homeowners several advantages over a home that hasn’t been deemed “green.”

According to the Huffington Post, the green rating increases the resale value of green homes by an average of 9%.  That may not seem like a lot, but factor in a $400,000 average home price in California and that 9% turns into $35,000.

The second thing that green ratings do for homes is increase the speed at which they sell. As environmental consciousness continues to rise, so does the demand to live in a green home. From the consumer mindset it makes sense. As people continue to change their diet and overall lifestyle to better suit the environment, the demand to live in an environmentally friendly home seems to be the next logical step. Green homes allow a green lifestyle to come full circle. With a certified green home, that veggie burger you are cooking is being made on an energy star approved appliance and the ventilation keeping you warm is made from recycled materials.

So, what is the downfall with green rated homes? It sounds too good to be true, right? You buy a home with a green seal, you live an eco-friendly life, and when you want to sell your home you can sell it faster and for more money. Well, these are all true but there are a couple things to look out for when buying your green rated home. First, there is no system to rate the upkeep of green labeled homes. Let’s say 5 years ago a home was bought with a green certification but over time the heating and ventilation was replaced with ventilation that didn’t meet any Energy Star standards. Despite the new ventilation the home would maintain a green label. Also, the increase in price on a green home can be a double-edged sword. Yes, on average you can sell your home for more, but that also means the home costs more to get into. For families on a tight budget this can hinder the ability to buy a green labeled home.

Remember, even if you don’t live in a green labeled home you can still carry an eco-friendly lifestyle into your home. How have you “greened” your resting place? It may be a garden in your backyard or cloth diapers for your little ones. Whatever it is, let us know in the comments!

photo: www.stephenschlange.com

 
The Golden State, The Translucent Killer: Smog

Smog Over Glendale Obscuring San Gabriel Mountains

As of 2010 California is home to eight out of the ten smoggiest cities in America. The ten smoggiest cities are:

Los Angeles, CA

Bakersfield, CA

Visalia, CA

Fresno, CA

Sacramento, CA

Hanford, Ca

Houston, TX

San Diego, CA

San Luis Obispo, CA

Charlotte, NC

In 1943, California was attacked. Peoples eyes began to water as they took wheezing gasps in a thick fog. It was the midst of WWII and America was on high alert.  Many Californians believed the Japanese were attacking with chemical warfare.

However, the attacker was not born of another country, but was created by the people of California themselves- out of their car tailpipes.  In 1943 California had the largest car market in the world, thanks in large part to a high immigration rate feeding it with unlimited customers. Though Californian’s economy produces more than many states combined, the Golden State’s chief product is smog. Smog is a polluting fog with toxic ozone levels.

Growing up in Washington I had never even heard of a smog warning, nor had I ever been told where to avoid exercising. I had never felt threatened by the air quality in Spokane. The same cannot be said for California. During my research I found out that there is such a thing as “ a Smog Warning” and “ a Smog Alert”- names Californians use to gauge whether it is okay to go outside or not. On a Smog Alert outside P.E. in schools would be cancelled, mothers would be cautious about letting their children outside, and athletes would train indoors all these things remind me of what would happen due to a bad snow day in Spokane, but snow is a natural occurrence. Smog is man-made, and as much as it pollutes the environment, it pollutes the people that created it.

Chip Jacobs, author of Smogtown: The Lung-Burning History of Los Angeles, gave an interview with Wired Magazine saying: “Throughout the ’50s and ’60s, some parts of L.A. were getting dangerous amounts of smog 200 days a year…  There were a lot of L.A. residents who barely saw the mountains through the brown-and-orange pollution. A lot of us got used to it. That was just the way it was.” In 2008, there were 90 toxic ozone days.

Today, the smog problem in California is persisting. The state is  certainly golden, but because of smog rather than a gold rush reference. I recently visited Los Angeles, California on a spring break trip. Looking up at the moon at night I was startled to see an orange glow radiating from it like a halo. This is not how the moon looks in Washington, where it appears pure and white, not here. I kept a keen eye out for smog  in California as I traveled throughout the state, visiting both Azusa and Occidental Universities where I continued to gauge my visibility level. It was raining for the beginning of my trip so for the most part visibility was good. As I drove to the airport to leave the state the sun was coming up. The higher it got, the worse the visibility became. Mountains I could once see were lost to the golden haze of smog. Over the city in the airplane I looked down. I could barely see the ground- not due to height, but the orange haze that covered it like a dirty cotton ball. As I flew north I was relieved to clearly see the greenery below as I came back to Washington.

California Smog, 1943

The Californian car market is still massive and its effects can still be seen as I have described. Floods of immigrants still huddle in California to plant their roots, population is increasing and with that comes an increase of smog.

What cost will bring an end to smog?

Surely not the 19,000 smog related premature deaths or the 9,400 hospitalizations, nor the 300,000 respiratory illnesses all predominantly caused by engine exhaust. This issue is as health related as it is environmental- technological advancements are killing us as a species, with all the other critters we share this world with too. Advances in technology need not be entertainment based, not the fastest, nor the sleekest- none of these things will benefit the long term. So what will? A shift in mindset from consumer based to environment based technology will. The environment encompasses your city, your town, your work, your home, your body, and even your pet- all of these things are interrelated as each individual person in the environment is to another.

91% of California’s 33 million people live with low quality air. One day I fear that Washington will become a golden state, and it will, unless the way that people live, and the technology we use, is changed.

You can find an array of eco-friendly products at Greencupboards.com

Wearing a gas mask, was part of a 1950 protest against smog.

Sources:

http://publicceo.com/index.php/local-governments/151-local-governments-publicceo-exclusive/1442-the-smoggiest-cities-in-america

http://www.revolutionhealth.com/conditions/asthma/asthma-info/10-smoggiest-cities?id=article.2008-05-05.3307617383&section=section_01

http://www.wired.com/thisdayintech/2010/07/0726la-first-big-smog/

Images:

http://www.executivehm.com/news/california-smog/

http://www.wired.com/thisdayintech/2010/07/0726la-first-big-smog/

 

What a novel idea: a machine that automatically pushes the leaves from your yard or driveway. You have probably all heard of a leaf blower and you have most likely heard a leaf blower. The noise is getting this landscaping innovation banned from many Californian cities. California government officials are calling the gas-powered leaf blower a source of unnecessary pollution, both in C02 and noise.

The leaf blower originated in 13th century Japan, whose people then used a hand-powered version of the motorized blower to clear garden plots of leaf litter.  In 1970 the motor was added to the Japanese invention, creating the modern day leaf blower that soon (after the power-adaption was added) came to America in 1970.

In 1986 in Sacramento, California, 75,000 backpack leaf blowers were sold in the city- prompting the creation of the Citizens for a Quieter Sacramento, an organization aimed at banning the leaf blower. in 1987 Sacramento there were 464,000 blowers sold and 800,000 in 1989. Whilst other bans have been put into affect in California, California’s capitol, Sacramento, is still un-restricted to leaf blowers yet has noise restrictions that change throughout the day in coordination with what time it is.

Carmel, California ban leaf blowers in 1975. The Carmel City Counsel stated:

The operation of a combustion engine blower for the purpose of displacing, removing or blowing any materials from or about public or private property in a manner which allows the engine to be heard on public property and causes the materials to be blown into the air in a manner which allows them to settle on public property or on private property not belonging to the same owner on which the blower is being operated is declared to be a public nuisance and unlawful.

Beverly Hills ban the blower in 1976. Stating:

It shall be unlawful for any person within the City to use or operate any portable machine powered with a gasoline engine used to blow leaves, dirt, and other debris off sidewalks, driveways, lawns, or other surfaces.

In West Hollywood, in 1986 the town counsel wrote:

The purpose of this Ordinance is to prohibit the use and operation of gasoline powered leaf blowers in the City of West Hollywood. These devices, used to blow leaves, dirt and debris, create an excessive and unusual amount of noise, often operating at up to ninety decibels. The sustained operation of leaf blowers at this decibel level is literally deafening to persons who reside and work within earshot of the many gardeners and property owners who utilize the devices. The sound is extremely annoying and distracting and not only causes disturbance of those in the vicinity of users of leaf blowers but has the potential to cause hearing damage. In addition, leaf blowers tend to blow dirt, dust and other particulate matter in the air, thereby reducing the air quality in West Hollywood, aggravating persons with allergies and asthmatic conditions and depositing such debris on other public and private property. There are many alternate methods of disposing of leaves available to gardeners and property owners, including electric blowers, rakes, brooms, vacuums and water. The use of gasoline powered blowers is hereby declared to constitute a public nuisance by virtue of the detrimental effect such blowers have on the community and residents of West Hollywood.

Banns followed in Belvedere in 1987, Indian Wells and Piedmont in 1990, Berkeley, Claremont, and Los Altos in 1991, Mill Valley and Laguna Beach in 1993, Santa Barbra and Lawndale in 1997, and Menlo Park and Los Angels in 1998.

Recently, in Newport Beach, a new city ban has put an end to gas-powered leaf blowers in the area. Councilman Rush Hill was quoted as saying “I hate blowers- They just drive us crazy in our house”. Electric blowers are still permitted in Newport and every Californian city with a blower ban treats the cleaner/ quieter electric blower differently.

In 1998, Senator Richard Polanco came up with legislation that would have banned the banning of leaf blowers in California city governments, but the Supreme Court overturned the legislation.

Leaf blowing does not seem like it would be a controversial issue, but it is. I have been awoken by leaf blowers during many a cat nap yet, I understand the convenience of the blower in the landscaping industry.

How do you feel about the leaf blowers in your area? Has your city council brought up the possibility of a ban? And if so, how does your city feel about the electric-powered leaf blowers which are described as being quieter and less polluting.

If you are in the market for a leaf blower, Greencupboards.com, GreenCupboards Blog’s parent site, sells several electric models:

http://www.greencupboards.com/worx-eco-cordless-3-pc-ni-cd-18v-combo-kit/p/

http://www.greencupboards.com/worx-eco-cordless-sweeper-blower-ni-cd-18v/p/

http://www.greencupboards.com/worx-eco-10-cordless-grass-trimmer-li-ion-24v-3-5-hr-charger/p/

Sources:

http://www.ehow.com/about_5533847_leaf-blower-history.html

 

http://www.nonoise.org/quietnet/cqs/other.htm

http://www.dailypilot.com/news/tn-dpt-0322-leaf-blowers-20110322,0,4876049.story

 

Does This Cow Look "Happy" To You?

Every child in America is told to drink a tall glass of cow milk to grow big, with hair on their chests, and strong bones. These are the benefits of cow milk, majority of people believe in them and with good reason, cow milk is healthy. But the benefits of this nutritious drink come at a cost, and not the $2.50 you pay at the supermarket. This article will not just go into the conditions of dairy cows, but also the workers that tend to them, many of them undocumented.

“Great cheese comes from happy cows. Happy cows come from California.”

Is the slogan for California dairy farms, currently PETA is suing the dairy farm for their use of this slogan:

“Our goal with the lawsuit is to let people know that if they’re consuming dairy products, they’re promoting cruelty to animals,” PETA’s Bruce Friedrich says.

Anyone who visited the dairy farms would not consider it a “happy” place, nor could that word be used to describe the cows or workers there. Dairy farms are dirty, muddy, urine drenched, manure plastered farms. They are not rolling grassy hillsides where the cows graze freely while the sunshine warms their backs, as many dairy farms ads would suggest.

“The Dairy Farmers of Washington’s mascot – called “Cow” – brings smiles to the faces of youngsters and adults alike wherever she appears throughout Washington.” A quote from the Washington Dairy Farmers website.

Its and Ironic statement to have the cow, the mistreated animal by the dairy industry represent them to make themselves more appealing to consumers, and as this marketing campaign suggest they are targeting children.

The Washington Cow Mascot

I would like to note that earlier this week I wrote about some unpleasant conditions of animals in Dog and Cat farms in China, in my article Eating Dogs and Wearing Cats, and an article about bear farms in South Korea and China, in Farming Bears for Bile.

Whilst the conditions of animals may be worst in China and South Korea, I have never seen an incident where those who ran the farms attempted to make there products more appealing by enlisting there mistreated animals to represent them as mascots.. Only in America.

Now for the cow facts:

At age two the dairy cows are artificially inseminated to keep them pregnant (the cows have to be pregnant to produce milk).

Calves are taken from their mothers within 24 hours their birth as they would consume 1 to 3 gallons of milk a day (dairy cows produce about 10 gallons of milk a day).

After three pregnancies and roughly a thousand gallons of milk the cows are all used up and are slaughtered. You can pick up what is left of the cow at your local McDonalds or Burger King.

A worker hosing off the cement after a milking.

So lets say you did listen to your mother and drank your tall glass of milk everyday, you grew big and strong with hair on you’re chest! With strong bones too! Then a cow kicks you in the face. At your work if you were to have your skull broken in three places would you get some sort of compensation and medical benefits to help you?

Would they at least help you off the floor? Gustavo waited on the floor bleeding for eleven and a half hours after being stuck in the head with a cow hoof. I would also like to note that Gustavo is not this mans real name, he is a worker still for a dairy farm and is still afraid of being fired.

If your wondering, did he go back to work after he was kicked by a cow the answer is yes. He had a metal plate put into his face, that is now slipping and he is losing his vision in his left eye.

“It’s a job with lots of risks. If I had papers, man, there’s no way I’d be working in a dairy. But in this town, this is the best job I can get,” Codename Gustavo says, adding.. “Every worker I know says they’ve been kicked or stepped on by a cow. It’s common. But one day (the cows) might break your bones, or maybe even kill you.”

And it’s true according to data gathered by High Country News 18 people have died in western dairies between 2003 and 2009.  The workers died in various ways, leading what some would call very depressing lives. On some of the farms workers work 80-hour weeks, sleep in the barn with the cattle, and drink from the troth. And the cows kick them, hay bales fall on them, and many tractor accidents occur. Yet many of those injured do not file claims if it is not serious enough like Gustavo’s, and many that do file claimed are fired because of it. Gustavo is thankful he was not fired for filing a claim.

“If you’re undocumented, you won’t complain. You won’t ask for extra water or a shade break or to not do a task you think is dangerous. These things lead to workplace injuries,” says Marc Schenker, director of the Western Center for Agricultural Health and Safety in Davis, Calif.

So what will you do to grow big and strong? With hair on your chest and bones of steel. Well all this time we have been talking about cow milk, but who says milk has to come from a cow?

A glass of almond milk.

There was an article in yesterdays Wall Street Journal entitled: Move Over, Cow. In this article there was an analysis of milk, bearing the question “Who’s the Milkiest of Them All?” Calories, Fat, Sugar, Vitamin D and Calcium, were all taken into account as well as how each of the prospective milks tasted in coffee, on cereal, when dunked in with a cookie, and finally the price.

Here are your stats on the classic 2% cow milk:

Calories: 130

Fat: 5 grams

Sugar: 12 grams

Vitamin D and Calcium: 25% and 30%

Taste: Rolls beautifully across the tongue. And buttery shade adds to its appeal.

With Coffee: Transforms black coffee into something creamy without overpowering it.

On Cereal: A little plain-Jane next to cereal with almond milk.

Dunking Cookies: Still the gold standard.

Price: $1.25 for 32 ounces

What the Wall Street Journal came up with as best alternative milk is almond milk, and here are the stats on that:

Calories: 60

Fat: 2.5 grams

Sugar: 7 grams

Vitamin D and Calcium: 25% and 30%

Taste: Pleasantly sweet and nutty; nice almond notes.

In Coffee: Smells great. Turns ordinary coffee into almond coffee.

On Cereal: Oh yes. Enhances but doesn’t overpower a bowl of raisin bran.

Dunking Cookies: A sweet-on-sweet experience. Improved the cookie by adding the flavor of a nut.

Price: $1.80 for 32 ounces

For the rest of the milk comparisons go  to: Move Over, Cow

Personally, after writing this article and studying dairy farms I will be switching to almond milk myself.

If any of you have any other good milk recommendations let me know.

I would like to thank all of those people who have begun to follow THEcommunity, I hope you are enjoying the articles I am publishing. You can add us on Facebook at or follow the blog on Twitter. I always publish the title of a new article on both of these networks.

I would also like to note that the site will be getting a new layout sometime in the next couple weeks. This should also fix any problems with functionality you may be currently experiencing on the site or by attempting to add this blog to your rss feed.

Many of the comments I have read are asking me if I developed the site alone, and the answer is no. THEcommunity was built in association with Greencupboards.com both that site and this one were designed in part by the Greencupboards crew, with the help of ars.

Thank you for following! Stay Green! And Stay tuned for more post to come!

-Connor Simpson

Writer/ Creative Director

Csimpsonism@gmail.com

These three workers were laid off for trying to organize a Union.

Sources:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2002-12-11-happy-cows_x.htm

http://www.havemilk.com/article.asp?id=2151

http://article.wn.com/view/2010/05/25/Animal_rights_group_claims_cruelty_at_Ohio_dairy_farm_x/

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703791904576075790255426176.html

http://www.hcn.org/issues/41.15/the-dark-side-of-dairies

Images:

http://food.change.org/blog/view/the_harsh_daily_reality_for_dairy_farm_workers

http://www.hcn.org/issues/41.15/the-dark-side-of-dairies

http://www.havemilk.com/article.asp?id=2151

sad cow disease?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703791904576075790255426176.html